Hi there, is it possible that on page 5 when you give proof of theorem 1.1 the property used of the following theorem (1.2) is the number 5 and NOT the property 2?
Hi Sergio,
you are right, I used Property 5 and not Property 2. Thanks for your correction. I will update the errata in the next hours.
All the best,
Matteo
Good morning prof. At page 6, in the proof of the “Law of total variance”, very last equality, an EV could have been missed (as it should be E[Var(X|Y)] ) instead of just Var(X|Y) ). Is that right?
Best
Andrea
Hi there, is it possible that on page 5 when you give proof of theorem 1.1 the property used of the following theorem (1.2) is the number 5 and NOT the property 2?
Hi Sergio,
you are right, I used Property 5 and not Property 2. Thanks for your correction. I will update the errata in the next hours.
All the best,
Matteo
Good morning prof. At page 6, in the proof of the “Law of total variance”, very last equality, an EV could have been missed (as it should be E[Var(X|Y)] ) instead of just Var(X|Y) ). Is that right?
Best
Andrea
Dear Andrea,
you are right, thanks for your correction. The errata file has been updated accordingly.
Cheers,
Matteo